Helicopter Experiment: Speed of Fall

Helicopter Experiment: Speed of Fall Hend Darwish Research Question: At what speed will the helicopter fall by adding more paper clasps to its base (the base)? Factors: Autonomous Variable: Amount of paper cuts Subordinate Variable: Speed Consistent: Same Helicopter Same Timer Same tallness (2m) Speculation: My speculation is that the more paper cuts added to the base of the helicopter, the speed will increment. I think this will happen on the grounds that gravity will pull the helicopter down and the contrary power (air opposition), which is following up on the wings will get more fragile in light of the fact that the wings will crease upwards. This will make less for the air opposition follow up on which will make the speed increment. Strategy: For our helicopter lab, we originally estimated two meters on the divider so we have will drop the helicopter at a similar spot. At that point, Eliah will drop the helicopter and Holly will time to what extent it takes with the stopwatch. We rehashed this progression for three mores tests and with two, three, four, five and six paperclips connected to the base. At that point, we found the normal speed of every paperclip and recorded our outcomes into a diagram. To make our test a reasonable test, we ensured its a similar individual planning and dropping the helicopter. Additionally, we generally dropped the helicopter from two meters. For our wellbeing, we ensured that we are in an unfilled space so we dont catch anybody or the paper helicopter doesnt go on someones head. Likewise, we ensured that we are not close to any synthetic substances or flared Bunsen burner so when we get our helicopter, it wont burst into flames or be secured by any synthetic substances that could hurt us. Mechanical assembly: 1 Paper Helicopter Stopwatch 100cm ruler 6 paperclips Outline: Information Collection: Measure of Paper Clips on a Helicopter The measure of paper-cuts on the helicopter Time taken for the helicopter to fall a separation of two meters (s) Preliminary 1 Preliminary 2 Preliminary 3 Mean Speed (m/s) 1 1.38 1.68 1.31 1.45 1.38 2 1.22 1.40 1.19 1.27 1.57 3 1.13 1.40 1.30 1.27 1.57 4 1.16 1.0 1.09 1.05 1.9 5 .96 1.30 .84 1.03 1.94 6 .63 .53 .81 .65 3.08 Information Processing: Table of Amount of Paper Clips Affect the Average Speed of the Paper Helicopter The measure of paper-cuts on the helicopter Time taken for the helicopter to fall a separation of two meters (s) Preliminary 1 Preliminary 2 Preliminary 3 Mean Normal Speed (m/s) 1 1.38 1.68 1.31 1.45 1.38 2 1.22 1.40 1.19 1.27 1.57 3 1.13 1.40 1.30 1.27 1.57 4 1.16 1.0 1.09 1.05 1.9 5 .96 1.30 .84 1.03 1.94 6 .63 .53 .81 .65 3.08 To get the mean, you need to include the three preliminaries together at that point isolate it by three. For instance: 1.83 + 1.68 + 1.31 =4.37 4.37/3 = 1.45 To get the speed, you need to partition 2 by the mean of the three preliminaries. For instance: 2/1.45 = 1.38 2/1.27 = 1.57 Information Presentation: End: As indicated by our diagram our theory was right: The more paper cuts added to the base of our helicopter the more the speed will increment. Our information compares with the line of best fit truly well up until our last information point which was 6 paper cuts and was 3.08s. It is a lot higher than the various focuses, I think this one specific bit of information is questionable in light of the fact that it portion not relate to the remainder of the information just as the diagram. This might be on the grounds that our planning strategies when timing the last one was diverse then the remainder of our chart. To ensure this would be a precise test, we completed three preliminaries for each paper clip(s) and afterward determined the mean and speed. Assessment: Â Â â Our Method was solid and amazingly exact in light of the fact that for each measure of paper cut, we had three preliminaries so we could make a normal speed. Additionally, we utilized a similar individual for clock and the dropper of the paper helicopter. In the event that I could re-do the trial, I would have made the stature higher, for example, 3-4m so we could have increasingly precise readings.